Skip to main content

No-Balls, Run-outs and Handling the Ball

There are 3 things that I have been pondering over for the last couple of weeks.

  • Why do batsmen have to be given out if their bat is in the air even after getting the bat over the line?
  • Why do bowlers get to keep their foot in the air behind the crease and still don't get a no-ball call?
  • If handling the ball is something that has to be decided whether it was done intentionally or not, why don't batsmen just put their hand out gently to stop the ball, when they find themselves in a situation where they know that they are definitely going to be definitely run-out?

Run-Outs and No-Balls


Bowlers can keep their foot in the air
behind the crease
Batsmen cannot keep their bat in the air over the crease

In the recently concluded ODI series between England and Pakistan, Asad Shafiq, in trying to sneak a leg bye of Graeme Swann had to turn back and ended up just getting the bat over the line, but with the bat in the air which proved just a touch costly as Kieswetter whipped the bails off.

Time after time off spinners (in general, but other bowlers too) keep landing their foot outside the crease but with their heel IN THE AIR within the crease and as per the rules they don't get any no-ball calls.

The no-ball rule is perfectly fair. But, why isn't it the same for a batsman when he is about to get run-out or stumped for that matter, when he could have the similar situation as a bowler with toes outside and the heel within the crease, but in the air?


Handling the Ball

This was a thought that came to my mind before the "Hussey Incident" actually happened. When a batsman is running to complete a run and if he is sure of getting run-out, he might as well put his hand out a little (in a manner that is not indicative of handling the ball), thinking that he still would have a chance of surviving in case the fielding side didn't appeal or the third umpire just thought it wasn't conclusive enough to give him out.

David Hussey in the controversial "Handling the Ball" incident. 
On the other hand, if he did try to complete the run and the ball ended up hitting the stumps, the fielding side would definitely appeal for a run-out and the third umpire would find it easier to judge a run-out rather than judging whether the ball was handled intentionally or not.

Accepting that the "Hussey Incident" wasn't one where he had absolutely no chance of making the run, the lines of thinking could still have been the same. When a run-out can be clearly decided on the basis of the evidence provided by the cameras, why not put a little doubt in it and make the decision-making a little tough to extend your stay at the crease? Could Hussey have been thinking on those lines?
  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Landmark Worth Remembering

This post is mainly for the people who are saying that Sachin's 100th century isn't that special because it came against Bangladesh. The others who don't think that way can read it and take pleasure in reminiscing all the great moments that this great man has provided over the past 23 years. First of all, saying that it's not that special because it came against Bangladesh is entirely wrong because Bangladesh are progressing well and they have shown signs of this in the ongoing Asia Cup, coming close to Pakistan's total in the opening game and beating India in their second. In fact their bowling attack is what they rely on to win matches most of the times. Getting a hundred off that attack is not as easy as everyone thinks. Secondly, there are opinions that when Sachin scores a century India lose which might have been true on so many occasions in the past. But, does that statement mean that Sachin is losing India games by scoring centuries? It doesn'...
10 comments
Read more

Captains Of This Era

               Captains of this era have all been the perfect ones for their respective countries, if one considers the situation that each country was in at the time of being made captain. Andrew Strauss, Graeme Smith, Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Ricky Ponting have all been good captains given the records that they possess even after such lengthy stays at the international level as captains. The thing that was common amongst these people was that they all had a good base for them to start on. Strauss was probably the one amongst these four to have started on shaky ground. Statistics as Captain for each player.                               Three people who catch the eye are Michael Clarke, Misbah-ul-Haq and Darren Sammy. All these 3 have been captain for about the same number of Tests which is on...
3 comments
Read more

ACA 2017/18: Falcons v/s Phoenix CC

The Falcons, with 2 victories on their back against ASU and Tucson Superkings at the start of 2018, entered Game 9 of their season to play Phoenix CC who were lurking at the bottom of the table. The Falcons, being favorites to win this game put on a thumping performance, bowling Phoenix CC out earlier on and wrapping the up target, ending the game at 13:33 local time. The game started with Phoenix CC winning the toss and electing to bat, and in the end, what seemed like the only thing that went in their way on the day. The Phoenix CC batting order never seemed to gain momentum even though they were able to maintain decent run rate of 4 an over as they lost wickets to some good bowling from the Falcons at such regular intervals that it almost seemed like it was all being played out from a script that was already written for them. At the end of 20 overs as the teams went into their drinks break, Phoenix CC had lost a few too many wickets to their liking even though they were trudgi...
Post a Comment
Read more